Feb 23, 2021
Richmond City Leaders, Community Groups Excoriate Chevron Over Oil Spill; Want Discussion Over Refinerys Future
This news has been received from: cbslocal.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
RICHMOND (BCN) — Richmond residents deserve more answers from Chevron and public agencies about an oil spill earlier this month and the community needs to discuss a future without the oil giant’s refinery operating there, city officials and local advocates said Tuesday.
The Feb. 9 leak of several hundred gallons at the refinery’s long wharf in Richmond caused a sheen of oil that spread from Point Molate to Brooks Island, according to a unified command for the spill that involved Chevron, according to the state Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Office of Spill Prevention and Response, Contra Costa Health Services and the U.S. Coast Guard. READ MORE: COVID Reopening: San Francisco Lifts 10-Day Quarantine Requirement For Travel Outside Bay Area
On a Zoom call with environmental and community advocacy groups, Richmond City Councilman Eduardo Martinez called the spill “another accident that could have been prevented” and said it is the latest mishap by the refinery to negatively impact Richmond.
Ben Eichenberg, staff attorney for the environmental nonprofit San Francisco Baykeeper, said the containment boom Chevron initially placed around the spill site was inadequate, allowing the fuel to spread.
“If it isn’t prepared to manage an even small spill, what would happen with something big?” Eichenberg asked.
He said, “We’d like to see the response agencies and oversight agencies do a better job of holding them accountable immediately after a spill like this,” adding that many basic details about the leak and its cause haven’t been released to the public two weeks later.READ MORE: Tiger Woods Suffers Multiple Leg Injuries In Southern California Car Crash
Chevron said in a statement following the spill that it “immediately initiated its response protocol, began working to isolate and contain the release, and notified all applicable agencies,” and is cooperating with the investigation into the case.
Lizbeth Ibarra, a 16-year-old who said she has lived in Richmond her whole life and is a member of several advocacy groups like Youth vs. Apocalypse, said there is a “toxic relationship” between the city and Chevron.
“I was disappointed but I can’t say I was surprised” by the latest spill, she said while calling for Richmond to transition the site to another use besides handling fossil fuels.
Andres Soto, an organizer with the organization Communities for a Better Environment, said any changes will have to come with the help of not just the city of Richmond and its community members, but also county, state and federal agencies.MORE NEWS: No Return Date Yet For San Francisco Schools; District, Unions Still Far Apart
His organization is hosting a town hall meeting next month on the topic of envisioning a future without a refinery in Richmond. The March 18 event will be held at 5:30 p.m. and more details about it can be found at https://actionnetwork.org/events/beyond-chevron-community-townhall-new-year-new-richmond.
News Source: cbslocal.com
Tags: san francisco news chevron richmond refinery oil spill richmond richmond city council san francisco news a future without advocacy groups the spill richmond city details san francisco according in richmond
US Dept. of Education curbs decision on race-based affinity groups
More On: joe biden Biden administration releasing families from Texas migrant centers in 72 hours GOP senator slams Biden for pushing through $1.9T ‘liberal wish list’ Biden opposed to ending filibuster, still hopes for bipartisanship: WH Sen. Manchin defends delaying $1.9T COVID relief bill
The goal of the programs — used by the New York City public school system and other school districts — is to separate students and staff by racial groups in order to help address discrimination and “white privilege.”
But the practice of separating schools into racial groups is discriminatory, a determination obtained by the Post found.
The findings — reached during the waning days of former President Trump’s time in office in early January — were in response to a complaint about a Chicago-area school district’s “racial equity” training programs and lesson plans:
Sources said the findings, if implemented, could apply to New York City and other school districts.
The Post last year exclusively reported about city early childhood teachers being asked to be segregated into discussion groups based on skin color, race and ethnicity following the George Floyd killing at the hands of Minneapolis police and the violent protests that followed.
Critics ripped the initiative for perpetuating racial stereotypes.
One Manhattan principal even recently asked parents to reflect on their “whiteness” to address “white supremacy”, “white privilege” and discrimination.
The 18-page “letter of finding” — drafted by federal DOE Office of Civil Rights enforcement director Carol Ashley — was triggered by a complaint filed by a former NYC arts teacher who now works in the Evanston-Skokie, Illinois. school district.
The DOE findings said the Evanston- Skokie School District violated civil rights law by:
— Separating administrators in a professional development training program in August, 2019 into two groups based on race — white and non-white.
— Offering various “racially exclusive affinity groups” that separated students, parents and community members by race.
— Implementing a disciplinary policy that included “explicit direction” to staffers to consider a student’s race when meting out discipline.
— Carried out a “Colorism Privilege Walk” that separated seventh and eight grade students into different groups based on race.
“If you are white take 2 steps forward. If you’re a person of color with dark skin, take 2 steps back. If you’re black, take 2 steps back,” the privilege walk exercise said..
The goal was for white students students to “learn more about white privilege, internalized dominance, microaggressions and how to act as an ally for students of color,” the lesson plan said.
But Ashely of the DOE concluded the school district “engaged in intentional race discrimination by coordinating and conducting racially exclusive affinity groups, which resulted in the separation of participants in district programs based on race in violation of the Title 6 regulation.”
She said “deliberately” segregating students and employees by race reduced them “to a set of racial stereotype.”
“These materials would have led students to be treated differently based on their race, depriving them of a class free from racial recrimination and hostility. Such treatment has no place in federally-funded programs or activities, nor is it protected by the First Amendment,” Ashley said.
She continued, “The District’s policy to impose racial discrimination in discipline has no part in federally funded education programs or activities,” Ashley said.
The teacher-complainant, who wished to remain anonymous, said she received a call from Ashley on January 6, who told her she issued a letter of finding that the Evanston-Skokie school district racial racial affinity group programs violated federal civil rights law.
But she was told she could not get a copy of the letter until the DOE reached a final compliance resolution with the school district within 90 days.
But on January 22 the teacher received a courtesy phone call from Ashley again, informing her that her case was being suspended due to President Biden’s new executive orders on equity to aid racial minorities and LGBT citizens. Biden has taken office just two days before.
The head of the Evanston-Skokie school district confirmed that the Biden order put the discrimination case on ice.
“I do not have specific comments for you because the School District has not received any final decision from the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights (“OCR”). Last month, the proceedings were suspended by OCR pending its reconsideration of the case in light of the Executive Orders on racial equity issued by President Biden,” said Evanston-Skokie Supt. Devon Horton said in a statement to The Post.
“At this time, there is no final decision in place with which the School District can comply or to reject,” Horton said..
A US Dept. of Ed spokesman, in a statement said, “OCR [Office of Civil Rights] does not comment on specific facts and circumstances related to open cases. OCR can confirm, however, that on Nov. 25, 2019, it previously opened an investigation of a complaint on the basis of race against the Evanston/Skokie School District (IL) for possible violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance.”
The spokesman added, “The Biden-Harris Administration has put equity at the heart of its agenda and has committed to taking bold action to fight racism and discrimination, as described in the executive orders on Advancing Racial Equity and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation. This commitment relates directly to OCR’s mission of ensuring nondiscriminatory access to education for all students through the vigorous enforcement of the civil rights laws.”Filed under department of education , joe biden , racial discrimination , 3/7/21