This news has been received from: msn.com

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

Nearly 100 Confederate statues were removed in 2020, but hundreds remain, new SPLC data shows Five board members of Texas grid operator ERCOT resign © Courtesy of FGI

Click here to read the full article.

There’s a lot going on in fashion when it comes to inclusion for Black creatives — there are the challenges of securing financing, issues tied to corporate America’s role in diversity, the risk of being pigeonholed as a Black creative, and grappling with ensuring ongoing support for Black-owned businesses.

At Fashion Group International’s “Rising Star Dialogues” event Tuesday, the aim was to unpack some of these issues.

More from WWD
  • Molly Goddard RTW Fall 2021

The event was held in honor of Black History Month and featured Apotts’ Aaron Potts, Jerrimiah James’ Jerry Buckner, You Go Natural’s Monique Little, Nyakio Beauty’s and Thirteen Lune founder Nyakio Grieco and Epperson’s Rodney Epperson. Writer and author Constance White moderated the 75-minute discussion. All of the panelists have been recognized by FGI as Rising Stars.

As White noted, less than 1 percent of venture capital funding goes to Black-owned businesses and that could even be lower in the fashion industry, she said. As for whether the interest in Black-owned businesses will continue beyond the current moment, Potts, for one, has gone the way of self-funding, but is open to other funding and aims to create a legacy brand that is connected to Blackness, as Willi Smith and Patrick Kelly have.

In response to White’s question as to why there hasn’t been a Black luxury brand that is doing well since Smith or Kelly, Buckner said, “The problem with guilt and just doing enough for a particular group of people happens to be just enough to keep people quiet. That’s what the bigger issue is. There’s a problem with providing equal opportunity to everyone. Until the system is dismantled and we’re just looked at based on our talents, our gifts and our abilities, there will always be a lack of proper representation as it relates to all things, not just sustainability and fashion from a retail perspective but cosmetics, designers what have you — across all industries.”

Without adequate funding to go the standard manufacturing route, Little said starting her business required hiring local seamstresses and having them make the product to order. That has allowed her to provide opportunities to other people in the community who might not otherwise have been able to work outside of their homes. Now, with 30 to 40 employees working in a new facility in Texas, Little said many of them are being taught the skill of constructing garments.

“Even though it was a challenge for us, the ways in which we have created solutions have also added to the tapestry that we are building. That is a really beautiful thing,” she said.

Potts addressed “the resounding issue of funding,” but said the biggest obstacle was in his head. Having been a career designer at other companies before starting his own, he said, “I functioned so much on what the merchandising plan had to look like, what the salespeople said, the changing tide of what your boss said. I realized that when I started my own brand I had to divorce myself from that kind of thinking. The promise I made was that creativity would lead this brand.”

In the process of seeking funding, Little described the challenge of convincing investors who may not understand that the market for pre-tied head wraps exists, as it is “a fashion and function product that serves the needs of Black women.” After five years of being in business, people often don’t believe the numbers, she said. “It’s definitely a cultural disconnect.”

At times, there’s a disconnect on the sustainability side, too.

“There’s this idea that people who care about the planet and the impact fashion has on the planet don’t necessarily look like me…the images that I see are men or women, who are white or lighter in complexion,” Buckner said, noting that sustainability is not marketed to people of color, based on his research.

Having just finished a friends and family pre-seed raise in financing, Grieco is now dealing with the seed raise. While the world has changed since the Aughts, she said much of the language being used in the VC spectrum hasn’t changed.

“I’m still getting a lot of the same pushback. There’s still this need to hold onto this old paradigm. The VCs are at the helm and they look the opposite of me — white men, who were often funding other white men. Even with their dedicated diversity dollars that are meant to help to change the narrative and help to build generational wealth, those dollars are still being held onto pretty tightly,” Grieco said. “Fifty-one percent of babies are multicultural. In 2041, these babies are going to be adults and they’re going to look like us.”

Encouraged by the nontraditional thinking going on at some of the larger banks, family offices, smaller funds, women-led funds and syndicates comprised of Black or Brown people, Grieco said she was also hopeful about the financial literacy being taught in different communities. Little to no investment in Black-owned businesses will not work, since Black and Brown people have “incredible buying power specifically in beauty. Latinx, Latina, Black — we buy more beauty than anyone,” she said.

There appears to be a more concerted effort to hold corporations accountable and to support Black-owned businesses. The Black Dollar Index, which launched Tuesday, is a consumer index that scores companies based on their investments in Black America — from hiring practices to supplier diversity.

“Across the board, we are a people of needs, [that] have not been met,” he said. “If that means largely supporting people of color, I am happy to meet that need.”

From Epperson’s perspective, the industry also needs to be wary of pigeonholing designers by race.

“First of all, I consider myself to be a designer who happens to be Black, not a Black designer. When I had a shop in Brooklyn, I was known as a Brooklyn designer. I had to strip myself from being considered a Brooklyn designer,” he said. “I would hope that it would just continue and they’re amazing designers and they’re Black, not Black designers or designers who were picked up at that time so let’s continue to support them.”

Adding to that, Potts said, “It has never really scared me to be considered a designer who is Black or a Black designer because I know what I’ve produced has been on the backs of people of every shape, color, size. I try to come from a place in my heart where I just speak to people and connect with people — no matter what they look like. My brand is really rooted in this idea of inclusion, acceptance and self-acceptance…but it has been very important for me to show an elevated vision of Black style and beauty. The world has been inspired by Blackness in a way that a lot of people, who consume [fashion] don’t really realize.”

News Source: msn.com

Tags: in black owned businesses and they’re there’s a black designer people of color a designer the world the world happens to be the challenge brand to look like considered brown people problem little said myself fashion fashion some

Schools return delayed for up to TWO WEEKS for thousands of pupils across country in postcode lottery

Next News:

Sen. Rand Paul Blocks Democrats from Funding Planned Parenthood Through Paycheck Protection Program

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) claimed a win Friday after forcing Democrats to remove from their COVID “liberal wish list” bill a provision that would have allowed every Planned Parenthood facility in the country to receive free taxpayer funds through the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP).

“Democrats knew this was never about COVID relief or helping small businesses,” said Dr. Paul, an ophthalmologist. “It was a shameless attempt to fund their radical agenda on the taxpayers’ backs and I was successful in preventing that from happening by stopping these funds from going to abortion mills.”

Dems knew this wasn’t about COVID relief/helping small businesses. Shameless attempt to fund their radical agenda & @PPFA on the taxpayers’ backs. I was successful in preventing that from happening by stopping these funds to abortion mills. Read more: https://t.co/K37N8cIYl5

— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) March 5, 2021

In a press statement, Paul’s office explained in the House version of the “massive $1.9 trillion liberal wish list,” individual Planned Parenthood facilities would have been treated as separate entities and, as such, eligible for the federal PPP aid.

Paul’s office explained further:

The original congressional intent of PPP was to limit large and well-financed groups, such as Planned Parenthood from receiving a loan, and instead provide relief to small business affected by COVID-19. Democrats had planned to waive affiliation rules for nonprofits to provide paycheck protection loans to Planned Parenthood in the House version of the COVID-19 relief package. The Paul team strenuously argued to the Senate Parliamentarian that this waiver would only benefit Planned Parenthood and thus violated the so-called Byrd rule. Before the Parliamentarian was able to rule on the arguments presented, the Democrats filed an updated version of the bill that did not include the offending provision – a concession that avoided setting a precedent.

Thank you, Senator @RandPaul , for preventing the money that was intended to serve as COVID relief for small businesses through the Payment Protection Program Program from going to Planned Parenthood. https://t.co/KW08s5rfrn

— CWA LAC (@CWforA) March 6, 2021

Thank you @RandPaul for protecting the millions of Americans who oppose taxpayer-funded abortion, as well as protecting millions of Americans still in the womb from the violence of abortion. https://t.co/Xb7MTroQnV

— March for Life (@March_for_Life) March 5, 2021

In May 2020, Planned Parenthood affiliates received $80 million in loans from the PPP in violation of the rules of the relief program. Subsequently, officials of the Small Business Administration and some members of Congress, including Sens. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Josh Hawley (R-MO), demanded the money be returned, threatening potential criminal prosecution.

Chairman Rubio called on AG Barr to & @TheJusticeDept to immediately review how Planned Parenthood Affiliates unlawfully received #PPP loans.

Read here ????https://t.co/HFWkIEyo8N

— Senate Small Biz (@SmallBizCmte) July 7, 2020

The money needs to be recovered and if anybody knowingly falsified applications, they need to be prosecuted
https://t.co/FKnrkHnE2P #FoxNews

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) May 20, 2020

Jacqueline Ayers, vice president of government relations & public policy at Planned Parenthood Federation of America, denied the provision in the current bill was related to “Planned Parenthood 501(c)(3) organizations,” according to Fox News.

“The local Planned Parenthood affiliates that previously obtained loans made available by the CARES Act were eligible under the affiliation rules defined by the Small Business Administration,” Ayers insisted, referring to Planned Parenthood abortion clinics as providers of “essential healthcare.”

“Now is the time for everyone to come together to address this pandemic and pass much-needed COVID-19 relief, not for uninformed political attacks on access to essential health care,” she said.

Similarly, in an op-ed at the Washington Times, Tom McClusky, president of March for Life Action, emphasized only nine percent of the COVID bill’s funding is actually slated to address the public health issues related to the coronavirus pandemic.

Nearly half of the funding in the measure will be held back from distribution until 2022, at the earliest, a time when the pandemic could largely have already subsided, he observed as well.

The Democrats’ covid bill: less for covid, less for workers – more for abortion providers! More for “environmental justice”! The America people deserve better pic.twitter.com/od7StumhQK

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) March 4, 2021

“A serious relief bill has devolved into a liberal wish list that, of course, funds the abortion industry,” McClusky asserted.

Other News

  • UFC 259 results, highlights: Amanda Nunes submits Megan Anderson in quick fashion to retain 145-pound title
  • Georgia House Passes State Budget with Five Percent Spending Increase
  • Rachel Weisz Birthday: Lets Discuss Her Illuminating Style File (View Pics)
  • Biden is rejecting the common-sense center on everything from schools to securing border
  • Iditarod dog sledding race resumes in Alaska amid COVID challenges
  • China faces huge climate and tech challenges in its bid for global leadership
  • JYK Discovery Charter School Hosts Social Release, Emotional Recovery Boot Camp For Students
  • UFC 259 discussion thread
  • Premier League ace Jack Grealish hits on former Love Island beauty — but is busted by boyfriend
  • Get the perfect Mother’s Day gift with these healthy treats and beauty deals
  • U.S. Bishops Condemn Taxpayer Funding of Abortion in the American Rescue Plan
  • Radiant !, Chiquis Rivera boasts her beauty full of glamor
  • Teen Mom star Jo Rivera’s wife Vee Torres goes makeup free on Instagram as fans praise her natural beauty
  • How much do Baltimore taxpayers spend per student?
  • How old is Zoella Sugg and what is her net worth?
  • Jen Psaki: Biden Would Welcome Meeting with McCarthy to Discuss Amnesty Bill
  • Maison Budget in Notting Hill hires two bakers
  • Bye, Bismarck: 144 Cities Could Lose Status as Metro Areas
  • Tommy Fury fight with Jake Paul backed by Eddie Hearn who claims ‘I’ve seen many worse pros’ than YouTuber