This news has been received from:

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

A baby girl has been spared a lifetime of disability after receiving pioneering spinal surgery — while still in the womb.

Emily Malkie, from Pennsylvania in the US, was diagnosed with spina bifida following an ultrasound when her mother was just 16 weeks pregnant.

A follow-up MRI showed the youngster was at risk of developing brain damage due to a build-up of spinal fluid in her skull.

Her mother Rebecca, 37, was transferred to the specialist foetal John Hopkins hospital in Maryland weeks later to have the intricate operation, which has only been carried out a few dozens times worldwide

The mother was told that the procedure had to be done within a four-week window between 23 and 26 weeks pregnant. Too early and the baby is still too small to operate on; too late and the damage cannot be reversed.

Spina bifida, which affects around 1,500 babies in the US every year and roughly 700 in the UK, occurs when the spine does not form properly in the womb, leaving a gap in the vertebrae.

It often leads to nerve damage that can cause paralysis in the legs, incontinence and, in some cases, spinal fluid to leak into the skull and cause brain damage.

A team of around 30 clinicians were needed to carry out the delicate procedure to repair Emily's exposed spinal cord and close the hole in her back.

The eight-hour operation involved cutting open Rebecca's uterus to allow the doctors access to Emily and draining away amniotic fluid that surrounded the baby.

Emily, now healthy and mobile at 20 months old, was born on August 1, 2019, weighing 5lb 15oz with no physical or mental disabilities.

Her parents say she lives a 'completely normal life' and is able to play with her siblings Hannah, seven, and Ben, five. 

NHS England said the surgery has been carried out in Britain on about 32 babies in the womb since January 2020 after being pioneered in the US.

Emily Malkie, from Pennsylvania, in the US, was diagnosed with spina bifida following an ultrasound at just 16 weeks

She avoided a lifetime of paralysis after receiving pioneering spinal surgery — while still in the womb

Her mother Rebecca, 37, was transferred to the specialist foetal John Hopkins hospital in Maryland to have the intricate operation, which has only been carried out a few dozens times worldwide. Pictured after Emily was born with husband Tom

A team of around 30 clinicians were needed to carry out the delicate procedure to repair Emily's exposed spinal cord and close the hole in her back

Rebecca had already enjoyed two healthy, full term pregnancies so had no reason to suspect there would be any problems when she fell pregnant with Emily in November 2018.

Her first scare came during a checkup at 16 weeks which revealed Emily had five times the normal amount of an enzyme present in the brain and spinal cord in her blood

  • Previous
  • 1
  • Next
  • Up to HALF of NHS doctors plan to work fewer hours and 20%... Mila's miracle womb surgery: How 30 NHS staff performed a... Terms 'able-bodied', 'epileptic' and even 'blind' are... Women who experience more stress around the time of...
Share this article Share

Further tests confirmed the child's spinal cord had not developed properly in the womb, leaving a gap in her spine.

Rebecca said: 'It was heart-breaking, the worst news of my entire life. Doctors told us that she could be severely brain damaged, have learning difficulties or trouble walking - I thought to myself I don't think I can raise a special needs child.

'We were transferred to a specialist hospital that told us about foetal surgery, which we had never heard of, and it's amazing what that surgery has done for my daughter.

Emily now lives a 'completely normal life' and is able to play with her siblings Hannah, seven, and Ben, five

The lesion in Emily's back where doctors performed the delicate surgery

Her parents are reminded of their scare by a little scar on the child's back 

'Now Emily is a normal, almost two-year-old except for a little scar on her back - she walks, talks and runs with her siblings and is of age appropriate development cognitively.

'I have to pinch myself when I see the scar on her back. We always hoped and prayed she would be a completely normal baby but never expected it to actually happen.'

Emily was the 19th baby operated on at the specialist foetal John Hopkins hospital in Maryland.

During the eight-hour surgery, in April 2019, surgeons made an eight inch incision across Rebecca's stomach and accessed Emily through creating three small holes in the uterus.

They then used one stitch to close the pencil-eraser-sized lesion on Emily's spinal cord. 

Among the team who carry out the surgery are fetal surgeons, neurosurgeons, anaesthesiologists - for both mother and baby - obstetricians, neuro-paediatric surgeons, radiologists, a scrub team and neonatologists in case the baby needs to be delivered. 

Rebecca said: 'I never thought my baby would have spina bifida - we decided to go for the surgery and to do it as soon as possible to give her the best chance in life.

'It was scary because it's such a long surgery to be under anaesthesia and I'd heard of other cases where they had to deliver the baby during the surgery very prematurely.

'I know how bad that can be for the baby because I've worked in the NICU for 14 years caring for dangerously premature babies. But I was willing to take that chance to give her the best chance at life.' 

Rebecca added: 'It's just amazing what this surgery has done for her.

'She has to go for an MRI once a year and ultrasounds on her kidneys every six months to monitor that everything is still okay but other than that she's got a completely normal life.

'It's very rare for her to be this healthy as a spina bifida baby, we're very lucky.'


Spina bifida is a relatively common birth defect, affecting about 1,500 to 2,000 babies born in the US each year and around 700 in the UK annually. 

Babies born with spina bifida have improperly formed spines and spinal cords.  

During development these structures - along with the brain - all arise out of something called a neural tube, a precursor the entire central nervous system as well as the protective tissues that form around them. 

Typically, this tube forms and closes by the 28th week of pregnancy. 

But in babies with spina bifida, it doesn't close properly, for reasons that are not entirely clear yet to scientists. 

Instead, these babies are left with a gap in the vertebrae, through which part of the spinal cord may slip, depending the severity.  


People with the mildest form of spina bifida - the occulta form - may not even know they have it. 

The gap between their vertebrae is so small that the spinal cord stays in place and they are unlikely to experience any kind of neurological or motor symptoms. 

In the next more severe form of the condition, called meningocele, the the protective fluid and membranes around the spinal cord are pulled through a gap into a fluid filled sack on the exterior of the baby's back. 

There's no actual nervous tissue out of place, so there may be complications, but they're less likely to be life altering. 

But in open spina bifida, or myelomeningocele, there are larger or multiple openings along the spine. 

Both the membranes and spinal nerves and tissues they're meant to protect are pulled outside the baby at birth. 

The symptoms vary wildly based on where and how severe these openings are. 

Some children may develop  little more than skin problems, while other with severe forms may be unable to walk or move properly, or develop infections like meningitis that can leave them with permanent brain damage.  

Making sure women get plenty of folic acid in pregnancy can help ensure the spinal cord develops properly. 

After birth, surgery to repair these openings may be performed and, in more recent years, some surgeons have begun repairing spina bifida in the womb.  

News Source:

Tags: topics index normal life’ ’completely normal and is able spinal cord life’ the child’s exposed spinal a completely normal from pennsylvania a team of around the protective weeks pregnant babies baby girl brain damage amazing what performed the surgery babies born her parents

Poteet wins MLB debut, Marlins edge Diamondbacks 3-2

Next News:

Bay Area residents say they want to save more money post-COVID

Bay Area residents say that after the unprecedented emotional and financial toll of 2020 and the COVID-19 pandemic they’re ready to save more for an emergency and pay down debt.

But maybe first they’ll splurge on that long-delayed trip. Or a really nice dinner.

Those are the findings of a new poll from the financial services firm Charles Schwab, which in February asked 750 Bay Area residents about their financial plans. Two-thirds of respondents said they considered themselves savers in 2020, and 82 percent also said they plan to save more than spend in the coming year.

More specifically, 51 percent said they plan to save more in general, while 28 percent want to pay down debts and 26 percent want to build up an emergency fund.

“Many people were experiencing some sort of an emergency in their own lives,” said Colleen O’Brien, a Charles Schwab Oakland branch manager. “Everybody knows they should save but this kind of catalyst, this event, really made people do it,” said

The results are similar to the findings of a new national survey from Bankrate and SSRS, which reported that about eight in 10 respondents said they had at least one financial regret coming out of the pandemic. The most common was not saving enough for emergencies, which topped not saving more for retirement and taking on too much credit card debt. About a quarter said they plan to save more for emergencies, while a fifth plan to spend less.

“Emergency savings has long been the Achilles’ heel of financial security, with too many Americans ill-prepared for the unexpected,” Bankrate’s chief financial analyst Greg McBride said in a statement. “The sudden and deep recession brought on by the pandemic has driven this point home.”

Renewed interest in saving money comes after a year that saw California reach a 16 percent unemployment rate in April 2020 driven by the pandemic and lockdowns meant to slow the spread of the virus. Through March, there were still 696,400 more unemployed Californians compared to the same time last year, according to data from the Employment Development Department.

More than half of Bay Area respondents to the Charles Schwab survey said they were financially affected by the pandemic in 2020, with roughly a third saying their salary or hours were reduced. More than a fifth were laid off or furloughed.

Still, some residents are hoping to have some fun post-COVID. About 53 percent of respondents said they dream about traveling again, and a third are planning to splurge on a vacation. Another 20 percent plan to break out money for dinner at a fancy restaurant and 14 percent will be hosting a party. The focus for people, O’Brien said, is now less about buying expensive items and more about shared experiences. Even she has been thinking about splurging on a trip now that vaccinations are more common.

“Is there anybody who hasn’t?” she said. “Maybe it’s not a trip to Europe, but maybe it’s a trip where we can all be together.”

Related Articles

  • Silicon Valley mobile home owners say they’re ‘hostages’ to land rent increases
  • What experts say is the one risk to the Bay Area’s economic recovery
  • Feeling strapped on a $400,000 income? That’s the Bay Area
  • Bay Area prices rocket higher despite feeble job market
For those hoping to be considered wealthy, the survey found Bay Area residents are scaling down how much money they think that would take, from $4.5 million in 2020 to $3.8 million this year. To be financially happy, residents say they need $1.3 million — down from the $1.5 million reported in last year’s survey.

O’Brien said some of that dip may be driven by people who during the pandemic were lucky enough to remain employed and decided to retire early, or realized they didn’t need as much money to retire as they had previously thought.

“What we found was that the focus shifted,” she said. “When you have all of this time when you’re saving more, you becoming more reflective.”

Of course, in parts of the Bay Area $4 million is barely enough to buy a house.

Other News

  • Elise Stefanik elected to replace Liz Cheney as House GOP Conference chair
  • It is in Minnesota taxpayers’ interest to invest in families’ housing stability now
  • Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data What to Plant in Your Garden to Help Save the Bees
  • Must-watch videos of the week
  • I’ve spent £24k turning myself into Barbie, I’m proud to be a bimbo with K-cup boobs
  • Can you save Corporal Jenkins in Mass Effect: Remastered Edition
  • I’m 44 and so hot women are trying to make me dump by 23-year-old girlfriend, everyone wants me as a sugar daddy
  • Yankees Luis Severino throws first live BP since Tommy John surgery
  • 3 Costars Emily VanCamp Dated Before Settling Down With Husband Josh Bowman
  • Emily Blunt says having to pass on playing Black Widow was a heartbreaker
  • I worked out with Emily Blunt's 'hardcore' personal trainer and learned I have a lazy left glute and hyper-mobile joints
  • Fetal Down syndrome abortions: Cotton, Hinson lead over 80 GOP lawmakers against disability discrimination
  • Australian woman wakes up with Irish accent after throat surgery
  • Instagram Model Claims Quintez Cephus Stole Her Stuff And Cheated
  • Leah Messer Is Scared To Undergo Surgery For Tumor
  • Commissioners save more than $1 million in bond refinance
  • RHOBH’s Kyle Richards shows off her new nose after plastic surgery makeover in first clip from show’s new season
  • Save 21% on this single-serve coffee maker + grinder with over 17K Amazon reviews
  • Iconic Facce gets 15 years for robbing bank to finance plastic surgery