Jun 11, 2021
Louisiana Legislature approves rules, money distribution for sports betting
This news has been received from: washingtonexaminer.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
Voters in 55 of Louisiana’s 64 parishes voted last year to legalize betting on sporting events. The practice remains illegal in the other nine.
Lawmakers were tasked with setting up the rules during this year’s regular session, which ended Thursday.Gov. John Bel Edwards is expected to sign the bills, clearing the way for state residents to begin betting legally as early as this fall.
Under Senate Bill 247, which gained final passage Thursday, anyone younger than age 21 still would be prohibited from placing sports bets. No more than 20 licenses to operate a sports book would be issued, and the state’s 16 casinos and four racetracks would have the first chance to apply. Video poker establishments and fantasy sports operators would be next in line.
License-holders also can provide for betting through mobile apps. Mobile sports betting providers said their technology can prevent bets from being placed in parishes where it isn’t legal.
The Louisiana Lottery Corporation will oversee betting kiosks in bars and restaurants that serve alcohol. Betting on high school or youth sports would remain illegal. Coaches, athletes and referees would be prohibited from betting on their own games.
House Bill 697 calls for a 10% tax on net gaming proceeds from on-site betting and a 15% tax on mobile betting. Edwards already has signed HB 697.
Senate Bill 142 deals with how to divvy up the fees, fines and other revenue associated with sports wagering. As amended Thursday, 25% (up to $20 million) would be dedicated to early childhood education, while up to $500,000 would go to a fund dedicated to behavioral health and up to $500,000 to disability services. Ten percent would go to local governments where bets are placed, 2.5% would go to supplementing horse racing purses and the rest would go to the general fund.States News Louisiana Gambling Sports
News Source: washingtonexaminer.com
Tom Cotton Dismantles Democrats Anti-Filibuster Claims
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) on Tuesday dismantled the Democrats’ anti-filibuster claims, where they claim it is a product of the Jim Crow era, after using it multiple times over the years to stop Republican legislation.
Cotton on the Senate floor said that he wants to remind his “friends” on the other side of the aisle how many times they have previously used the filibuster. Cotton explained the Democrats under former President Donald Trump had repeatedly stopped voting on various bills “hundreds of times.”
He added, in the past, some of his Democrat “friends” had “simply voted not even to have a debate” for bills like coronavirus relief package, which “could have gotten aid to families and businesses when they needed it.” But, instead, the Democrats filibustered that bill until after the election.
“They blocked even a debate, even a debate on policing reforms last summer that might have helped provide police departments across the country with additional financial support or training resources,” he also explained. Cotton said he could list numerous bills that the Democrats blocked.
“Yet today, the Democrats act as if it’s some terrible affront that we’re not even going to have a debate on a bill that would be one of the biggest power grabs by Washington in the history of our democracy,” Cotton continued to say. “So then you have a lot of democrats who are complaining that the senate rules and customs, the filibuster has to go. They say it’s a racist relic of the Jim Crow era.”
Again in the middle of his floor speech, the senator wanted to remind the Democrats, they “over the years used the filibuster to block civil rights progress.”
During his speech, Cotton added into the record a letter from April 2017 that was authored by Republican Sen. Susan Collins (ME) and Democrat Sen. Chris Coons (DE), signed by over 60 senators, which had urged then-Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and then-Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) “to preserve the existing rules, practices, and traditions as they pertain to rights and members to engage in extended debate on legislation.”
Cotton read part of the letter which noted, “that these rules have changed on our executive calendar when we consider Judicial nominees or Executive branch nominees.” Though the group of senators added, “we are mindful of the unique role the Senate plays in the legislative process, and we are steadfastly committed to ensuring that this great institution continues to serve as the world’s greatest deliberative body.”
He read that the group had belatedly asked the leaders, McConnell and Schumer, to join them in “opposing any effort to curtail the existing rights and prerogatives of senators to engage in full, robust and extended debate as we consider legislation before this body in the future.” Cotton added that 26 of the signers were Democrats who are currently serving in addition to Vice President Kamala Harris, making her the 27th.
The senator said, “somehow something’s changed since 2017,” noting that the Democrats “now think that the senate rules must be destroyed so they can pass their massive power grab.” He suggested that what has now changed is the majority noting, “Democrats have the most slender reed of power with Joe Biden in the White House and a 50-50 Senate and a four-seat majority in the House.”