Jun 11, 2021
Keystone XL victory emboldens green groups in fight against Line 3 pipeline
This news has been received from: washingtonexaminer.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
After securing the death of Keystone XL, emboldened environmentalists are projecting confidence about their chances of convincing President Joe Biden to intervene in other oil pipeline disputes.
Their top target is the Line 3 pipeline in northern Minnesota. A company is poised to replace an aging pipeline to transport crude from Canada’s Alberta oil sands through the state's watersheds and tribal lands to Superior, Wisconsin.
KEYSTONE XL DEVELOPER TO PULL THE PLUG ON PIPELINE
Enbridge, the Canadian-based project developer, says the $9 billion pipeline expansion is needed to replace an existing pipeline from the 1960s that is corroding and only operating at half capacity.
But groups fighting the project said it threatens drinking water because of potential leaks and infringes on the rights of indigenous people who use the headwaters for hunting, fishing, and harvesting wild rice.
“If President Biden wants to have any credibility on climate and indigenous rights, this is a key test," said Collin Rees, a senior campaigner with Oil Change U.S. “The pressure is going to be all-out on them, and they will have to make a decision.”
Line 3 is also another symbolic target representing activists’ argument that fossil fuels must be kept in the ground in order to combat climate change.
The defeat of Keystone XL, coming as the company developing the pipeline deemed it nonviable this week after Biden canceled a key permit for it, proved to activists the merits of their contention that no new oil and gas infrastructure is compatible with a carbon-free future.
“We are seeing a shift and increasing acknowledgment from companies in some cases that it’s best to close the book,” Rees said. “It shows how incredibly difficult it is to build a pipeline anywhere in the U.S. that isn’t Texas or Louisiana.”
The fight over Line 3 grew in prominence this week as activists descended on northern Minnesota, where protesters seized a construction site along the pipeline route, which led to tense standoffs with police and the arrests of more than 160 people.
But so far, the Biden administration has declined to weigh in on the project, even though the federal government has authority over the pipeline because it crosses federal waters.
Biden, on his first day in office, canceled a permit for the better-known Keystone XL pipeline, which would have also delivered crude from Canada's Alberta oil sands to a different destination of refineries on the Gulf Coast.
That decision prompted backlash from labor groups, a key Biden constituency, who said the cancellation would kill thousands of construction jobs.
Since then, the administration has demonstrated reluctance to oppose other pipelines approved in the Trump administration targeted by environmentalists. These projects differ from Keystone XL, which was never built, in that they are either operational or enhancing existing pipelines.
This spring, the Biden administration declined to order the controversial Dakota Access oil pipeline to shut down while it completes an environmental review, dealing a blow to green groups and Native American tribes that had sought to stop it from operating.
Christine Tezak, managing director of ClearView Energy Partners, a research group, noted that Biden passed on the opportunity to stop Dakota Access, or DAPL, despite having “political cover” from multiple courts that have found the Trump administration’s environmental review of the project to be deficient. She sees even lower odds of Biden stopping Line 3, since that pipeline has yet to suffer a court defeat.
“The best sign for Enbridge has been the Biden administration’s approach to DAPL, which suggests if there is a lot of folks depending on a pipeline currently in service, the administration seems to be very sensitive to the disruption that would be caused by shutting it down,” said James Coleman, an energy law professor at Southern Methodist University.
Coleman also suggested the Biden administration would be unlikely to intervene at a time when consumer prices are rising at their fastest rate in more than a decade, including a big jump in energy costs. The Biden administration has been defensive about gasoline prices that rose in the aftermath of the cyberattack on the Colonial Pipeline, which carries transportation fuels and not oil.
The oil industry, meanwhile, says the Line 3 project is even more important after the Keystone XL defeat. The Line 3 replacement would double existing capacity of the pipeline to 760,000 barrels of oil per day at a time when Canadian oil sands production is hitting records with the recovery of prices as the outlook of the pandemic improves.
Many analysts have projected a global oil supply shortage coming out of the pandemic as companies have slashed their production, including in the United States.
Robin Rorick, vice president of midstream and industry operations at the American Petroleum Institute, said if oil demand returns to normal levels and Line 3 is stopped from being built, much of the same Canadian crude oil would still be produced but shipped by rail, which is costlier, entails higher emissions, and is less safe.
“It’s not like you are stepping on a hose and stopping the flow,” Rorick said. “It’s more like you are blocking a stream and the water will have other places to go."
Line 3’s opponents, however, argue the long-term market outlook for the Canadian tar sands is bleak, given the oil is particularly emissions-intensive, there is competition from cheaper U.S. shale, and projects could struggle to obtain capital as climate-conscious companies and investors have divested from oil sands in recent years.
Rees predicted there will be no market need for the expansion of Line 3, or the Trans Mountain pipeline, a project backed by the Canadian government that would carry an additional 535,000 barrels a day of oil from Alberta’s tar sands to the coast of British Columbia.
Rees and other opponents say visceral moments from this week’s protest are what could draw the administration’s attention.
In one instance, a low-flying Department of Homeland Security helicopter blew debris and dirt on protesters, prompting an investigation by the agency.
Line 3’s opponents assert the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers could revoke a Clean Water Act permit issued during the Trump administration.
Environmentalists are also pressing their case in court. A decision is expected next week in one case, filed in Minnesota state court by tribes and environmental groups, challenging state utility regulators’ decision to approve Line 3. Minnesota’s Democratic Gov. Tim Walz has not come out against the project and has instead called for the court process to play out.
That has green groups focused on Biden.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
The Stop Trump Pipelines campaign is holding an event Friday to press Biden to cancel Line 3, along with another Enbridge pipeline, Line 5, that runs across the Great Lakes in Michigan and is being contested by that state’s Democratic governor, Gretchen Whitmer.
“Avoiding the lock-in you get when you build another pipeline for 60 years carrying tar sands oil is not a thing that fits in any climate model,” Rees said of Line 3.News Energy and Environment Keystone XL Dakota Access oil pipeline Gretchen Whitmer Climate Change Minnesota Canada
News Source: washingtonexaminer.com
Tags: states states keystone xl developer to pull the plug on pipeline news energy and environment keystone xl dakota access oil pipeline gretchen whitmer climate change minnesota canada the biden administration the biden administration alberta oil dakota access oil pipeline the trump administration opponents alberta environmentalists environmental review northern minnesota the administration gretchen whitmer the pandemic at a time keystone xl to replace green groups to intervene like you the canadian the pipeline pipeline the project declined
36-year-old Chris Paul and his leadership helped turn the young Phoenix Suns into a playoff juggernaut
Chris Paul led the Suns to a sweep over the Nuggets. AAron Ontiveroz/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post/Getty Images
- Chris Paul scored 37 points on Sunday to help the Suns reach the Western Conference Finals.
- Paul's arrival in Phoenix helped the Suns snap a 10-year playoff drought.
- Teammates and coaches rave about Paul's leadership and his effect on a young team that is surging.
- Visit Insider's homepage for more stories.
Abdel Nader tried not to judge Chris Paul before he met him in Oklahoma City.
Of course, he had an idea of what Paul, then a 15-year veteran and 10-time All-Star — a "legend," as Nader put it — was like. But Nader wanted to see for himself.
"He definitely exceeded all my expectations as a leader and as a player," Nader told Insider before the Phoenix Suns completed a sweep of the Denver Nuggets on Sunday to advance to the Western Conference Finals.
"I started playing with him when it was a little bit later in his career, and, I'm not gonna lie, I thought it was, like, almost a decline for him. And then he has this huge season."
That season, Paul made his first All-Star team in three years and helped lead a Thunder team most had pegged for a lottery unit to the playoffs.
Months later, he was traded to the Phoenix Suns alongside Nader.
Nader, a 27-year-old fourth-year player, has now twice seen Paul defy expectations, watching courtside as Paul has continued to win games, all while holding off a decline that simply hasn't come.Chris Paul is one of the most vocal leaders in the NBA. Mitchell Leff/Getty Images Paul's arrival in Phoenix helped the Suns snap a decade-long playoff drought. On Sunday, Paul showed he has plenty left in the tank for a deep playoff run, scoring 37 points on 14-of-19 shooting to go with 7 assists as the Suns advanced to the next round.
"When you look over his career, everywhere he's gone, he's been a big reason why those teams have been put in a position to win and win big," Suns assistant coach Willie Green told Insider in March. "You can argue that he hasn't won a championship and whatnot, but he changes organizations for the better."The CP3 effect in Phoenix is real
Both Nader and Green testify to Paul's work as a leader, whether organizing workouts, team dinners, or having teammates over his house to watch games. He is talking — always, always talking.
"There's a difference between watching the game and watching a game," Nader said. "I'm noticing like all these little aspects and details, just because I've heard him speak nonstop for two years, and it's made me just a smarter basketball player."
Nader added: "He's the smartest player I've ever played with and that I've ever seen, honestly."
Nader, who called Paul a coach out on the floor, said Paul is in constant search of a "counter."
"He realizes that there's a counter for everything," Nader said. "And then once you start to look at the game the same way, and you've been around him for a while, you start realizing there is a counter for everything. It just makes it easier."
Paul's counters were evident on Sunday. Paul bludgeoned the Nuggets from the midrange. He picked out weaker defenders to attack in the pick-and-roll, then pulled up the from elbow to drain midrange shots, punishing Nuggets centers for playing a "drop" defense — that is, backing up to defend the rim rather than playing up on opposing ball-handlers.—NBA on TNT (@NBAonTNT) June 14, 2021
In a postgame interview on TNT, Paul admitted that his midrange game was an adjustment he made years ago.
"Years ago, when I played with the Clippers, the whole league went to this 'drop' defense, and I was like, 'If that's what y'all are gonna give up, I'm going to try to perfect it,'" Paul said.
He then cut himself off, seemingly realizing he may be giving away tactical advice.
"But it's not about that. I'm so grateful to my family, my team."
Indeed, Paul is not doing this alone. Fellow All-Star guard Devin Booker carries a tremendous scoring and playmaking responsibility alongside Paul. Third-year center Deandre Ayton has played remarkably disciplined basketball on both ends in the postseason. Wings Jae Crowder and Mikal Bridges defend, spread the floor, and move without the ball. Journeyman backup point guard Cam Payne gave the Suns huge minutes in the first round when Paul battled a shoulder injury.
But according to Green, Paul has helped shepherd this young Suns team.
"I've seen him grow in the sense that he's willing to relinquish some of the leadership to other guys," Green said. "He understands how important it is for all the guys to take a step forward in there and lead by example, lead with their voices."
Nader said: "He's always teaching. Always teaching the game to all his teammates, especially the younger guys. You can't ask more from a leader."
Again, these qualities shined in the second round. In Game 2, Paul deferred, putting on a point guard masterpiece, dishing out 15 assists with 0 turnovers.
Then in Game 4, the veteran took over and stepped on the Nuggets' throats — Paul's 37 points were the most he had scored in a game since 2018.—NBA on TNT (@NBAonTNT) June 14, 2021
"A couple years ago, they was writing me off: 'You can't do this,'" Paul said in his postgame interview on TNT.
"It's not about me; it's about us. Show them what you can do when you come together as a team. We got a great team over there, and it's a lot of fun to be a part of it."
Paul and the Suns are now four wins away from the NBA Finals. But they'll have a long rest as they wait to see if they'll play the Utah Jazz or the LA Clippers in the conference finals — Paul's second conference finals of his career and Phoenix's first since 2010.
"I think sometimes people don't give him enough credit for what he's done in the NBA and what he's done with the different organizations that he's been to," Green said back in March. "He's made a major impact. It's just hard to come by leaders like him."