Oct 17, 2021
Steve Bannon Could Face Criminal Charges in January 6 Panel Showdown
This news has been received from: Heavy.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
Getty Steve Bannon.
The House committee investigating the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol is tasked with providing as full an account as possible of the attempted insurrection. But there is a problem: Not everyone is cooperating.
As of October 14, 2021, Steve Bannon, a one-time aide to former President Donald Trump, has stated that he will not comply with a committee subpoena compelling him to give testimony.Bannon’s lawyers have said their client is not acting out of defiance; rather, he is following the direction of Trump, who, citing executive privilege, has told Bannon not to produce testimony or documents.
Either way, Bannon now faces the prospect of criminal contempt charges.
Bannon isn’t alone in being subpoenaed by the Jan. 6 committee. Trump’s former chief of staff Mark Meadows, former deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino, former chief of staff to the acting United States Secretary of Defense Kash Patel and former Trump Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark have also been served. Meadows, Scavino, Patel and Clark – unlike Bannon – have not said whether they will comply, although their actions suggest a degree of foot-dragging.
The responses to the subpoenas serve to delay and frustrate the committee, which now finds itself caught up in a legal fight that may deny the committee information it seeks.
It also serves to highlight that the committee has an array of tools at its disposal to gather evidence from reluctant witnesses. But there remains lingering uncertainty over how these powers of the committee rub up against claims of presidential executive privilege.Investigating the ‘Darkest Days’
Congress handed the committee a fairly wide charge to gather evidence. On June 30, 2021, lawmakers passed House Resolution 503, charging the committee with investigating the activities of law enforcement, intelligence agencies and the armed forces relating to that day as well as uncovering the factors contributing to the attack, including technology, social media and malign foreign influences.
Ultimately, the committee aims to issue a report with detailed findings and suggestions for corrective measures.
The select committee has already used one of its main tools for investigating the attack on the Capitol: holding public hearings and inviting testimony from key players in the attack.
Four police officers who had defended the Capitol during the attack gave testimony during the committee’s first hearing.
The committee is now looking to hear testimony from former White House staffers, rally organizers and members of Congress. It can also ask for and receive information from various government agencies and private organizations.
The panel has used its power to issue subpoenas to obtain information it deems vital to the investigation from former Trump administration officials, such as Meadows, Scavino and Patel, as well as organizations that planned the Jan. 6 rally.Compelling Requests
A subpoena is a legal order requiring a person to appear and testify or produce documents.
House Resolution 503 expressly authorizes the committee to issue and compel subpoenas for documents and testimony.
Historically, congressional committees have preferred to cooperate with the other branches of government to obtain information. But if a cooperative approach does not produce the information the committee needs, it can subpoena information and testimony from members of Congress, former White House staffers, social media companies and even the former president.
While in office, President Trump repeatedly claimed executive privilege, which allows a president to withhold certain information from Congress, the courts or the public, in response to congressional subpoenas served on officials in his administration.
Now Trump has advised his former aides not to testify before or provide documents to the committee. He claims that such cooperation would violate executive privilege. He has also asserted executive privilege to prevent the release of records pertaining to his administration from the National Archives, even though the Biden administration has said that it does not object to the release of the information.
The law is less than clear about whether a former president can successfully claim executive privilege in the face of a congressional subpoena. The executive and legislative branches have historically preferred to avoid such confrontations and to negotiate the sharing of information.
As a result, federal courts have yet to determine the extent of the executive privilege retained by former presidents and when they can assert it.
Trump has extensively claimed executive privilege to cover not only matters of whether he himself can be forced to give evidence but also whether his former aides have to. In Bannon’s case it is even more curious as he didn’t work in the White House during the period in which the Jan. 6 committee is investigating.Little Support for Claim
The resistance to the Jan. 6 subpoenas could lead the courts to revisit issues over executive privilege that have not been considered for 40 years.
In a 1977 decision, the Supreme Court held that former President Richard Nixon could claim executive privilege in challenging a federal law known as the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act. That law ensured government agencies and, ultimately, the public could have access to certain documents and tape recordings made during Nixon’s presidency. Although the court allowed Nixon to make the executive privilege claim, it ultimately ruled against him and upheld the law, noting that the lack of support for Nixon’s claim by other presidents weakened his arguments for executive privilege.
Trump would not have a stronger claim. President Biden has already signaled that he will not support Trump’s assertion of executive privilege in an attempt to prevent disclosure of testimony or documents relating to the Jan. 6 attack. In fact, Biden’s rejection of Trump’s request to block the release of around 50 documents to keep them from being entered into evidence led Trump to formally claim that executive privilege should prevent their disclosure.
As to Trump’s former aides, the Department of Justice has already informed Trump administration witnesses that it does not support any assertions of executive privilege on matters relating to efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.Legal Battles Ahead?
In light of the Nixon case and the positions taken by the Biden administration, former Trump officials may face an uphill battle in arguing for executive privilege.
Meadows and Patel are in negotiations with the panel and may be trying to avoid further confrontation over the issue.
In the case of Bannon, the Jan. 6 committee’s chair has said the panel will pursue criminal charges, with a vote expected to take place the week of Oct. 18.
This action shows a desire by the committee to flex its considerable power in requesting information, even if that means engaging in a protracted legal battle with the former administration.
And if Bannon and other former Trump aides continue to resist, the courts may have to step in.
Portions of this article originally appeared in a previous article published on Aug. 3, 2021.
By Kirsten Carlson, Associate Professor of Law and Adjunct Associate Professor of Political Science, Wayne State University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
News Source: Heavy.com
Tags: breaking news breaking news politics breaking news 5 fast facts crime politics shopping former white house staffers trump’s former the biden administration government agencies executive privilege associate professor congressional subpoena to obtain information former chief of staff trump administration members of congress his administration investigating former president former president that it does not that he will not criminal charges house resolution information the committee the information the release testimony information it the executive the committee attack department and testimony documents committee preferred legal battle steve bannon this article social media on officials former trump the capitol prevent relating has already not support from forme
Five transfers incoming Man Utd interim Ralf Rangnick could go for in January including blockbuster Erling Haaland move
THINGS are about to change at Manchester United.
Pressing guru Ralf Rangnick is set to be appointed interim manager by the Red Devils this week, signalling a sharp change in direction by club chiefs.6Ralf Rangnick is set to take charge at Man UtdCredit: EPA
United's squad is already brimming with quality, and a number of players who could revitalise their careers under a new voice.
But in order to implement a new style of play, while climbing the table, Rangnick may need to recruit some new stars.
SunSport takes a look at five players the 63-year-old could try and sign in January.ERLING HAALAND
Half of Europe seems to be linked with the Norwegian star, but Rangnick's appointment could give Man United the edge.
The German has a prior relationship with Erling Haaland, having recruited him from Molde for RB Salzburg in 2019.
SunSport revealed over the weekend that the Red Devils are hoping Rangnick can help give them the edge over their rivals when it comes to signing Borussia Dortmund's No9.6Erling Haaland starred for RB Salzburg after being recruited by RangnickCredit: AFP Most read in Premier LeagueLive BlogUNITED LATEST Rangnick told to sign Haaland as Bailly confirms arrival, Chelsea DRAWLive BlogFOOTY LIVE Neymar horror injury LATEST, Newcastle want £4m Hoffenheim midfielderLive BlogGUNNERS LATEST Bukayo Saka INJURY, Stoica 'bid', Lacazette looking at January exitLive BlogCHELSEA 1 MAN UTD 1 Jorginho earns point with penalty after horror error gifted Sancho goalPicturedNEY GOOD Neymar leaves St Etienne on crutches in protective boot after horror injuryNOT R-ON Cristiano Ronaldo DROPPED by Manchester United for Chelsea clash
FREE BETS: GET THE LATEST BETTING SIGN UP OFFERS AND FREE BETSAMADOU HAIDARA
Rangnick brought Amadou Haidara to RB Leipzig while managing the German side in January 2019.
And he could recruit him again three years on, with the Mirror reporting interest.
It would appear to be mutual, with Haidara himself having told Bild in 2019: "I like Manchester United very much and watch as many games as possible. I dream of playing there."6Amadou Haidara played for Rangnick at RB SalzburgCredit: Getty DENIS ZAKARIA
Man United are reportedly one of a number of European giants chasing Borussia Monchengladbach midfielder Denis Zakaria.
The Swiss ace's contract is set to expire at the end of the season, putting the continent's elite on alert.
According to Italian reporter Nicolo Schira, Barcelona, Juventus and Roma are all eager to sign the 25-year-old.6Denis Zakaria is in demand this seasonCredit: Getty RONALD ARAUJO
Barcelona fear that Man United could lure defender Ronald Araujo to Old Trafford.
The Uruguayan arrived at Barca in 2018, since breaking into their first-team set-up.
But with his contract set to expire in 2023, ESPN report that the Catalan giants are wary of interest from United and Liverpool potentially turning his head.6Ronald Araujo has burst onto the scene with BarcaCredit: Rex DUSAN VLAHOVIC
Serbian striker Dusan Vlahovic has become hot property in 2021.
The 21-year-old has banged in 13 goals in 15 outings in all competitions for Fiorentina this season.
United are reportedly in the race to sign the £70m-rated star, alongside the likes of Tottenham, Newcastle, AC Milan and Juventus.
⚽ Read our Football news live blog for the very latest rumours, gossip and done deals6Dusan Vlahovic is one of Europe's most in-form strikersCredit: Rex Roy Keane and Jamie Carragher locked in BLAZING row over Ronaldo joining Man Utd