Oct 20, 2021
Democrats battle against reducing child tax credit and other cuts in spending bill
This news has been received from: washingtonexaminer.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
As if Democrats didn’t have enough problems advancing a stalled social welfare spending package, party lawmakers are now battling over efforts to reduce the length of a child tax credit they hope to include in the legislation.
Progressive Democrats said Tuesday they will not accept a behind-the-scenes proposal to slash the length of an extended child care tax credit to just one year.
'BULLS***': JOE MANCHIN DISMISSES REPORT HE'S CONSIDERING LEAVING DEMOCRATIC PARTY
The proposal surfaced in talks at the White House between the Biden administration and Democratic negotiators who are looking for ways to cut the cost of the bill to around $2 trillion.
Leading House progressives firmly rejected the idea, arguing the tax credit has pulled thousands of children out of poverty and must remain in place. They want to make the tax credit permanent.
“A one-year extension is a mistake," said House Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Rosa DeLauro, a Connecticut Democrat. “It’s very harmful to the country, and to children and to families.”
Democrats and Biden passed a yearlong expansion of the Child Tax Credit in March 2021 as part of a $1.9 trillion COVID-19 aid package. The credit provides families with up to $3,600 annually for each child, depending on their age.
The money has been doled out in monthly payments of $250 to $300 dollars.
Democrats are now eager to make the tax credit permanent, arguing it is reducing poverty on a large scale. They want to leave it in place without a work requirement and with an income cap that would include individuals and households earning six figures.
But the tax credit is on the chopping block, or at least part of it, as Democrats look for ways to lower their massive social welfare spending bill from an initial cost of $3.5 trillion to a much lower $2 trillion.
And they may have to cut more.
Reports indicate Sen. Joe Manchin, a centrist Democrat pushing to lower the cost of the bill, has informed the White House he is willing to accept a spending bill costing a maximum of $1.75 trillion.
But Democrats don’t want to cut any of the programs and subsidies they have been striving to push into law for many years, if not decades.
Party lawmakers and activist groups staged a rally outside the Capitol on Wednesday with the Washington Interfaith Staff Community to make their case, arguing it is a moral imperative to get the spending package across the finish line while Democrats control both Congress and the White House.
“Please, please, let us not squander this precious moment,” DeLauro said at the rally. “It will not come around again.”
Democrats are also pushing back against efforts to cut other parts of the bill that would provide billions of dollars to expand Medicaid to every state and provide additional Obamacare subsidies to help people buy health insurance.
“I’m proud to stand here with my colleagues, to demand that that is not just an imperative, it's a moral imperative,” Rep. Terry Sewell, an Alabama Democrat, said, speaking at the rally alongside a constituent who is unable to pay for insurance. “We want to make sure that these are permanent so that people … don't have to struggle trying to figure out how they pay their medical expenses."
The interfaith group staging the rally, which aligns with Democrats, embarked on a 12-hour prayer vigil beginning at 7 a.m. Wednesday, aimed at convincing lawmakers to pass the spending bill without harsh cuts.
Differences remain significant, however, and despite the urging of Democratic leaders to produce a framework by the end of the week, by late Wednesday lawmakers had not demonstrated any tangible progress toward an agreement on what to cut from the bill.
In addition to the child tax credits and healthcare funding, Democrats have yet to figure out how to curb the cost of a plan to provide paid family and medical leave and have not settled on a compromise with Manchin over green energy policies he opposes.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Manchin wants to cap the child tax credit to earners making less than $60,000 and is demanding it maintain a work requirement.
“We are not there,” House Progressive Caucus Chairwoman Pramila Jayapal, a Washington Democrat, said. “We are in the middle of negotiations.”News Congress Joe Manchin House Democrats Pramila Jayapal Obamacare
News Source: washingtonexaminer.com
Tags: news congress joe manchin house democrats pramila jayapal obamacare the cost of the bill the child tax credit a work requirement house progressive to figure out how spending package pramila jayapal the white house the length the washington tax credit spending bill arguing it democrats to lower the spending at the rally they want want to make for ways joe manchin
Green Bay Rep. David Steffen Promotes Packers Tax Rebate
moreby Benjamin Yount
Rep. David Steffen, R-Green Bay, said a lot of folks in Brown County love the idea of a tax rebate from Lambeau Field. But as Packer fans, Steffen says the same people are a little leery about his plan for the stadium tax.
Steffen, who not only represents Green Bay but used to work for the Packers, wants to get rid of The Green Bay/Brown County Professional Football Stadium District, and allow the city of Green Bay to essentially take over its functions.
“We developed [The Stadium District] to get through the process of the $300 million redevelopment project, but we really didn’t spend much time contemplating the end of this process,” Steffen told The Center Square.
The Wisconsin legislature approved The Stadium District, a 0.5% Lambeau Field sales tax, and a ticket tax back in 1999 to pay for those renovations. The sales tax ended in 2015, but the District and the ticket tax continue.
Steffen wants to transfer both to the City of Green Bay.
“The Stadium District, as of the end of 2015, no longer had a statutory mission. However it still exists, and it still has a tremendous amount of excess revenue under its control, $81 million, that it can use for operations and maintenance expenses related to Lambeau Field,” Steffen explained. “[The District], as part of its mission-creep, has started to expand its approach, mission, and use of dollars over the last several years. And while I believe the use of that money is meritorious, it is different and beyond the legislative and statutory authority it was granted.”
Steffen’s plan would not only shift the Stadium District’s duties, it would return most of that excess money to taxpayers.
“Since the taxpayers funded that, I want them to get the biggest bite of the apple,” Steffen said. “My rough draft version has $45 million of that $81 million going back to the taxpayers via a homeowners’ tax credit check.”
Steffen is clear, his plan is a rough draft. He is not only circling his proposal among lawmakers in Madison, he’s allowing Brown County taxpayers to weigh-in as well. Steffen has a short survey at his legislative website that asks fans their thoughts.
“People want to understand it,” Steffen said. “What’s going to happen to my team? What does it mean for the city of Green Bay? These are natural questions, and they go back to the reason why I wanted to ask ‘Okay public, here’s my rough draft. Please let me know what you think.’”
Steffen said taxpayers stand to get some of their money back, and said Packer fans shouldn’t worry about the team losing out on any money.
“The Packers are now in the Top Five of all NFL organizations in the country,” Steffen said. “Their unencumbered cash reserves are now over half-a-billion dollars. They generated, in a pandemic year without a single paid attendee, $1.1 million-a-week in net profit.”
The Packers have recently added to those financials. The team is in the middle of a $90 million stock sale. That money is earmarked for stadium upgrades as well.
Steffen plans to let his proposal gather feedback and to gauge its support at the Capitol before calling the idea for a vote.
Green Bay’s mayor has said he is willing to look at the proposal. Leaders in Ashwaubenon, where Lambeau Field is technically located, say it’s premature to talk about ending the Stadium District and the local taxing situation.
– – –
Benjamin Yount is a contributor to The Center Square.
Photo “Rep. David Steffen” by Wisconsin State Representative David Steffen.